Key Takeaways
- Each statute sets the menu of orders (e.g. Code, s. 51(2); OCT Act, s. 30(4)–(5); LSA, s. 35(1)).
- Some findings carry mandatory orders (Code, s. 51(5); OCT Act, s. 30.2).
- Prior history, insight and remediation commonly matter.
- Some statutes direct panels to consider prior findings (e.g. NHCLA, s. 57(4.3)).
The Menu of Orders
Health college panels may revoke, suspend, impose terms, reprimand, fine up to $35,000 and order reimbursement for sexual abuse therapy funding (Code, s. 51(2)). OCT panels may revoke, suspend for up to 24 months, impose terms or delay orders on conditions, and for misconduct may reprimand, fine up to $5,000 and award costs (OCT Act, s. 30(4)–(5)). The Law Society Hearing Division has a wider menu, including practice restrictions and trust account requirements (LSA, s. 35(1)).
Factors Panels Weigh
- Seriousness and harm.
- Whether conduct was isolated or a pattern.
- Prior discipline history.
- Insight, remorse and remediation.
- Public protection and confidence in the profession.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are penalties consistent between cases?
Panels look at comparable decisions, but each case turns on its facts.
Can I propose my own penalty?
Yes. Penalty submissions are a normal part of the process, often as a joint submission.
Sources
Statutory references are to the provisions listed below, as consolidated on e-Laws when this page was prepared.
- Health Professions Procedural Code (RHPA, Sched. 2), s. 51 — Checked November 10, 2026.
- Ontario College of Teachers Act, 1996, ss. 30, 30.2 — Checked November 10, 2026.
- Law Society Act, s. 35 — Checked November 10, 2026.
- New Home Construction Licensing Act, 2017, s. 57 — Checked November 10, 2026.