Key Takeaways
- Interim orders turn on risk of harm (e.g. Code, s. 25.4(1); OCT Act, s. 29.2(1)).
- An undertaking that addresses the specific risk can make a suspension unnecessary.
- Undertakings are usually noted on the public register (Code, s. 23(2), para. 11).
- Negotiate clear terms, reporting and an end point.
Why Undertakings Work
The legal question for an interim order is whether your conduct exposes or is likely to expose patients, students or children to harm. Restrictions targeted to that risk, such as no unsupervised patient contact, a chaperone, a practice monitor, or not performing a particular procedure, may meet the concern without removing you from practice.
Designing an Undertaking
- Tie each term to a specific risk.
- Name who will supervise or monitor, and how they will report.
- Set how the undertaking will be reviewed or ended.
- Confirm exactly what will appear on the public register.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is an undertaking an admission?
It should be worded to avoid admissions where possible. Get advice on the language.
Will my employer accept it?
Some terms, such as supervision, need employer co-operation. Confirm before offering them.
Sources
Statutory references are to the provisions listed below, as consolidated on e-Laws when this page was prepared.
- Health Professions Procedural Code (RHPA, Sched. 2), ss. 23, 25.4 — Checked November 10, 2026.
- Ontario College of Teachers Act, 1996, s. 29.2 — Checked November 10, 2026.