Interim Orders and Suspensions

Practice Monitors and Supervision as Alternatives to Suspension

Supervision is one of the most common alternatives to suspension. It works best when it is specific, credible and reportable.

  • Topic Interim Orders and Suspensions
  • Sources checked November 10, 2026
Draft for legal review. This page has not yet been reviewed by Ryan J. Manilla.

Key Takeaways

  • Discipline committees can require practice only under supervision (e.g. PEA, s. 28(4)(e); Architects Act, s. 34).
  • The Law Society Hearing Division can restrict how and where a licensee practises (Law Society Act, s. 35(1)).
  • Interim terms, conditions and limitations can include supervision (Code, s. 25.4(1)).
  • A good supervisor is independent, qualified and willing to report.

Where Supervision Appears

The engineering and architecture statutes expressly allow orders requiring a member to practise only under the personal supervision and direction of another member, and to accept periodic inspections and report (PEA, s. 28(4)(e); Architects Act, s. 34). Health college interim orders can impose terms, conditions or limitations (Code, s. 25.4(1)).

Making It Credible

  • Choose a supervisor the regulator will respect.
  • Define scope: which work, how often, and what review.
  • Agree on written reports to the regulator.
  • Plan for absence or replacement of the supervisor.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who pays for supervision?

Usually the professional. Factor the cost into your proposal.

How long does supervision last?

That is negotiated or ordered. Build in a review point.

Sources

Statutory references are to the provisions listed below, as consolidated on e-Laws when this page was prepared.

  1. Professional Engineers Act, s. 28 — Checked November 10, 2026.
  2. Architects Act, s. 34 — Checked November 10, 2026.
  3. Law Society Act, s. 35 — Checked November 10, 2026.
  4. Health Professions Procedural Code (RHPA, Sched. 2), s. 25.4 — Checked November 10, 2026.

Keep Learning About Your Proceeding

Read how Ontario regulatory proceedings typically unfold, or compare how other regulators handle complaints, hearings and appeals.